Op-Ed: Ménage à trois with China – Can Nepal handle it?
I have some serious apprehension and grave concern about Maoists leaders desperately trying to get China as much involved as possible in Nepal’s political developments especially after the establishment of Republican Nepal. Given Nepal’s geopolitical setting and with India’s blatant and outright intervention in Nepali politics that has become more so common at present than in the past, Maoists trying to neutralize the Indian impact in Nepali politics by getting China involved seems a prudent choice politically at the first glance, but can we afford to get China so involved regarding Nepali politics without irking our southern neighbor seems to be the question that we need to ponder upon.
Even though Maoists supremo Prachanda is not the leader of the government at present but as the champion of the communist agenda in Nepal and as the leader of the Maoists party fighting for the civilian supremacy, he recently had a weeklong rendezvous with his counterparts in China where he also had a chance to visit the place where Chairman Mao was born. Even though the details of his discussions with the members of the Chinese Communist Party has not been completely disclosed or made public to the media, one can guess what blessings he must have gotten from his visit to China.
Southblock specialists on Nepali matters must be carefully watching and analyzing Prachanda’s visit to China and it is yet to be seen how it is going to react to Maoists’ increasing nexus with the Chinese. Even though south block is downplaying Prachanda’s recent visit to China by not commenting on it, it is well known to all of us how India gets worked up and cries foul on anything Nepal has to do with China. The fact that Nepal has much closer relations with India than with China has more to do with the geography of Nepal than with the cultural and traditional ties that both countries share because it is geography that defines most of the economy in our context.
If Nepal’s relationship with India is compared as a conjugal union, then it is not the one that is normal and mutually agreed-upon by any standard. In this analogy India very well fits the character of a drunkard control freak manipulative obsessive misogynistic husband that cannot see Nepal befriending with any of its neighbors, especially a giant, rich, powerful and masculine neighbor like China. India does not mind Nepal being friends with his other ‘conjugal partners’ such as Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Maldives, etc. All these other nations who are in similar situation to Nepal in terms of their relationship to India have one advantage over Nepal in that they have access to sea which in the above analogy is like those partners having their own place to stay and hence enjoy a little bit of freedom from their wife-beating bully husband.
In the same analogy Nepal’s situation is like of a very beautiful but brutally impoverished housewife whose all maternal gifts that she brought with her (I mean natural resources in Nepal) are in her freak husband’s control and therefore she has no other choice or alternative but to be suitably submissive to her bully husband and succumb to his morbid fantasies. Just like a husband who is afraid to lose his beautiful wife does not let her out to socialize with anyone, India shares similar complexes in terms of its relations with Nepal. Therefore it seems as if India has locked Nepal up in a small corner at the backdrop of his carefully guarded bungalow thereby limiting her access and freedom to any other neighbors and friends who she can cry for help in times of need.
Being tired and desperate with the brutalities that she has to endure from her husband, Nepal often seeks some help and some sympathy from her northern neighbor China. Prachanda’s recent visit to China can be taken into this context. Nepal’s northern neighbor who even though does not understand the language or the culture that Nepal has been brought-up into, likes to help Nepal every now and then but is also very likely to enjoy the troubles Nepal has with India since China and India as the next superpowers of the world, it is only natural for them to hate each other.
Since Nepal is like a beautiful lady who is young and pristine with loads of gifts she has been provided with, while taking any help from her northern neighbor, she has to be really very careful not to let her northern neighbor think that she wants to run away with him. Even though Nepal does not have any problems with her northern neighbor, it is a well known fact that her northern neighbor is also a big bully who is like India but only more powerful, stronger, and richer. It is also obvious to the outside world that Nepal’s northern neighbor has brutally tortured its conjugal partners (Tibet for example) in the past and has been controlling other partners (Taiwan ) even today with an iron fist, therefore any help from this neighbor cannot be taken without a grain of salt for bully’s intentions should never be completely trusted.
So Nepal on one hand has to free herself from her obsessive bipolar partner India and might need a help or two from her northern neighbor to be independent and completely free but while doing so she has to be really very careful not to flirt with the northern neighbor to such an extent that entices his own virile fantasies upon Nepal for he is a bully too. She also has to realize that flirting with her northern neighbor should be kept to a minimum because this neighbor is even bigger, stronger, powerful and worst of all he is uncomfortably situated at our ‘backend’. If Nepal does not handle her giant and powerful neighbors carefully and strategically she will be screwed up at both ends at the same time by these bullies which will be painful for Nepal beyond any conceivable imagination.
What Comrade Prachanda and other Nepali leaders should understand is that while the concept of Ménage à trois might seem a very exotic and sensational experience as in the case of United States enjoying with Canada and Mexico, getting screwed up at both ends simultaneously by giants like China and India would not be any fun to Nepal at all while it very likely will put her in a complete state of FUBAR.
what a interesting dialogue happening here. wish we could receive a alert when there is some good happening stuff here. i have to side on mr. alok's side. comparing Nepal to a bitch or a women being done from both sides is not only offensive, it's not right it seems. But mr. prabhat's take on Nepal and its neighbor countries is very intelligent. he speaks a fact here. i have met many who are in nepal to do good. I have to agree it is not easy country to live in but there are many goods. If Nepal wants to stand on its own two legs then we have to stop depending on India but that will not happen anytime sooner I'm sure. Judgeing someone on their opinion and judgeing them for being out of Nepal is not right. many nepalese outside of nepal want to do good for the country too. this story can be offensive to some but it tells the honest truth and to go further that is needed. But I can feel for mr. alok's commentary too. But great stimulating story by mr. prabhat.
Dear Mr. Lamichane and Mr. Navin, After reading your responses to my response to the article, I would like to offer you both my apologies for being "not sane" and "totally out of line". My limited vocabulary and lack of knowledge, my "desperately weak, defeated and bankrupt mentality with a sense of deep rooted frustration and chronic inferiority complex, my lack of sensitivity to your "artistic and symbolic way of writing" or even perhaps my lack of any respect for someone who thinks the country where he was born, that gave him the fertile grounds that enabled him to think of that same geographical space as a woman getting squizzed from both ends by drunks and masculine neighbors, deserves to be addressed in any other manner. Or perhaps it would have been more acceptable had my venting been done in a more flowery language that smells of wannabe upper class hypocritic shit. Oh what fun it is to abandon ship because one deserves better.
Angry at the world? Au contraire, messieurs, je suis tout au plus la paix ici au Népal et serai ici jusqu'à la mort me faire part. Je n'ai aucune envie de quitter mon beau pays et deviennent esclaves par un autre système. Ne comprenez-vous? Unlike you i am not complaining about living in Nepal. I'm dealing with the shit that we're in and will do all I can to make things better for myself and my people. I will not run away because things are bad. I am here and will be here till my dying day. If i wanted to get out of Nepal I would have done so long ago.
And Nepal is no ones bitch. If there are any bitches they are the leaders who keep kissing the asses of their political masters and people who have the ability to change the world but who leave because there is too much suffering. And it is precisely because of this defeatist mentality's like yours that these so called political leaders do the same. And to add to the fire of the yagya, it is because of the likes of arm chair intellectuals like you sitting in the comforts in your "land of the free and perfect democracy" that every time Nepal's path to progress is blocked. Nepalis have not been able to get the freedom, peace and progress that we deserve because of these bullshit intellectual debates where people are only willing to debate but not willing to take action.
Its easy to sit back and bitch about whats wrong with the world, messieurs. Why dont you try coming back and face the music here and perhaps you will be able to understand why I think comparing your country to a woman getting it from both ends is a sin, punishable by suffering.
Other than that my apologies for the language. I do not usually use the F word but my blood doth boil when I hear or read shit like this. Like i said nationalism is not dead, at least not for me. If you want to be creative why dont you write about how we can change things for the better instead of bitching about all that is wrong like everyone else, then you would be able to gain some respect from me. Better still instead of just writing why dont you come to nepal and show the people how to build a better safer environmentally friendly, ecologically sustainable, economically viable, socially profitable way to go about it. Then i would really honor you. Otherwise dont be just another bitch.
It is not the person but the thought/mentality that has to change.
Saab ko mangal hos. Jai hos.
Alok Tumbahangphey
Mr. Tumbahangphey, First of all thank you very much for reading my article and commenting on it. I am glad that it encouraged you to make an effort to think, not entirely certain how sane your thoughts are though. Because going by how you have responded, the tone of your language and the personal vilification you have attempted, it just appears to me as an outcome of a desperately weak, defeated and bankrupt mentality with a sense of deep rooted frustration and chronic inferiority complex which might have kept you from understanding what I was trying to convey in the article.
Regarding my article, all I wanted to say was that our country should not let foreign powers make us dance to their tunes if we really want to safeguard our pride and sovereignty. I am really disappointed that you did not get the message right and the way I presented it.
I hope and wish for you to be able to recover and channel your vigor for something not negative since expecting something positive and constructive from you at this time seems a little too much to ask for.
Thank you.
Mr. Alok's response is totally out of line. This is merely an artistic or a symbolic way of writing. He seems to have no appreciation for the way the writer created this metaphor. mr Alok seems to be angry at the world and for living in nepal. If you are suffering so much get out. it's not good for the country or for you. it is true that nepal is the bitch of india and even china. lets face the truth and not hide behind your so-called patriotism.
IF THIS IS ABOUT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION GIVE HIM THIS: WHAT THE FUCK? [Censored*] MR WRITER/ENVIRONFUCKINGMENTAL ENGINEER FOR HAVING THE AUDACITY TO COMPARE MY HOMELAND TO A WOMAN GETTING IT FROM A DRUNK AND A MASCULINE NEIGHBOR. YOU MUST BE IMAGINING YOURSELF AS SOME SUBCONTINENTAL HENRY MILLER OR HAVE YOU BEEN JUST LIBERATED LIVING IN THE LAND OF THE FREE? NATIONALISM MAY BE DEAD TO YOU BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY BALLS WHY DON'T YOU COME HERE AND STRUGGLE LIKE THE THOUSANDS WHO ARE DOING SO HERE IN NEPAL. YOU SEEM TO HAVE AN UNFULFILLED FANTASY OF GETTING IT FROM TWO GUYS AT THE SAME TIME. WHAT AUDACITY TO COMPARE THE LAND OF YOUR FOREFATHERS, THE LAND THAT LET YOU LIVE YOUR FUCKING AMERICAN DREAM FULFILLING YOUR PARENT'S MIDDLE CLASS DREAMS TO HAVE THEIR SON WORKING IN THE US. GET A LIFE, BETTER STILL GET LAID AND GET OVER IT. WHEN YOU HAVE LIVED YOUR AMERICAN DREAM AND FEEL LIKE COMING BACK "TO YOUR PURKHAULI GHAR" IN A COUPLE OF DECADES, WHEN YOUR AMERICAN BORN CHILDREN ASK YOU DADDY WHY WERE YOU A CALLED A "NATURALISED CITIZEN" AN ALIEN, DADDY DADDY WHERE ARE MY GRANDPARENTS, WHERE WERE YOU BORN. WHAT MADE YOU LEAVE YOUR COUNTRY, AND WHEN THIS DOES HAPPEN MAYBE YOU WILL WANT TO THINK OF COMING BACK BUT NOT HAVE THE GUTS TO DO SO. CAUSE YOU MR. LAMICHANE ARE JUST ANOTHER NON RESPONSIBLE NEPALI WHO THINKS HE IS DOING THE COUNTRY AND INTELLECTUALISM A GREAT FAVOUR BY BITCHING ABOUT ALL THAT IS WRONG BUT NOT DARING TO DO THEM RIGHT. DO YOU HAVE THE BALLS TO COME AND STRUGGLE IN NEPAL? YOU THINK WORKING FOR THE US EPA QUALIFIES YOU TO PLACE MY COUNTRY IN YOUR UNFUCKING FULFILLED FANTASY? YOU HAVE SOLD YOUR SOUL MR LAMICHANE, AND WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO GET IT BACK FOR YOU. COME TO NEPAL AND STRUGGLE AND ONLY THAT WILL LIBERATE YOU.
* With due respect to the writer and readers, we have censored direct insults.
@Neeraj: Thanks for the prompt reply. I am aware of the meaning of op-ed but considering the local and larger context of the journalism (read op-ed journalism) in practice, my only concern (personal) as a reader was that of the gatekeeping problem and the opinion journalism (usually least researched) exploited by op-ed pages.
As VENT team must have also apprehended, this piece by Lamichhane is in your cover page and was the cover feature (the priority of space) until the photo story (which i believe need advisory for graphical content) replaced the former's space this morning.
Now, affirming my belief in what you've written in regards to the editorial stand, as a reader I look forward to read plural voices on the same issue of "serious apprehension and grave concern about Maoists leaders desperately trying to get China as much involved as possible in Nepal’s political developments especially after the establishment of Republican Nepal."
Will keep reading.
Venter!
Dear Arpan,
Thank you for your concern and questions towards the article. It’s of great compliment to us that a person of journalistic background would take time to regularly visit our site and comment.
I think we have some confusion with the “Op-Ed” category. It is a common mistake to think that an Op-Ed should carry the “opposite” opinion of the editorial board since the abbreviation is from “opposite the editorial page” or also believed to be from “opinion-editorial”. But this is NOT true. The term opposite came not because the opinion published is opposite to the editorial board BUT because it is published on the opposite side of the editorial.
Although standard editorial pages have been printed by newspapers for many centuries, the first modern op-ed page was created in 1921 by Herbert Bayard Swope of The New York Evening World. When he took over as editor in 1920, he realized that the page opposite the editorials was "a catchall for book reviews, society boilerplate and obituaries". [Meyer, K. (1990). Pundits, poets, and wits. New York: Oxford University Press.]
V.E.N.T’s mission is to promote integrity, free speech and citizenship journalism. As a responsible information media, the board does not have any political stand or view on this matter. As the writer of the article can contest, we do not change, influence or promote any views. If you do have an opinion, we do welcome it and ask you send to us for publication. We encourage open debates and hope to find your participation in the future.
~Neeraj Gorkhaly, V.E.N.T! Magazine
@Nabinn: I am not saying the opinion piece is bad or the comparison. If you don't understand my comment, please "Don't criticize what you can't understand?" The writer is not the editor of this magazine--definitely, I understand that and the piece definitely a free opinion and not of the magazine--my question is specific: What is the editorial stand on the issue on which the free opinion has been made?
@admin: Just a plain inquiry if the admin thinks it should be addressed because as you see there is a "serious apprehension and grave concern about Maoists leaders desperately trying to get China as much involved as possible in Nepal’s political developments especially after the establishment of Republican Nepal."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)
Exactly, my point in brief sentences but still, what is the editorial stand on this piece if the readers may ask?
An op-ed, abbreviated from opposite the editorial page (though often believed to be abbreviated from opinion-editorial), is a newspaper article that expresses the opinions of a named writer who is usually unaffiliated with the newspaper's editorial board. These are different from editorials, which are usually unsigned and written by editorial board members. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Op-ed
This opinion piece is really good. love the comparison. don't quite understand Arpan Shrestha's comment bout editorial. Is this writer editor of this magazine. I thought this piece was free opinion not of magazine. ranju: i agree. sex and politics r both dirty game. Keep writing. really enjoyed and captivating for sure.
op-ed: Adjective (of newspaper content) opposite the editorial, usually an article expressing personal opinions
So, what's the editorial stand here?
sex and politics...freakin' awesome!! what a great read!!!




Dear Prabhat, Relation of Nepal and India cannot be compared to that with Nepal and China. Both relations have subtle components making them exclusive from each another.
As Culturally, Religiously and Racially Nepal is proximal to India. China is always treated as trustable friend.
We cannot reach on the conclusion,
"since China and India as the next superpowers of the world, it is only natural for them to hate each other"
This statement cannot be justified, super powers naturally hate each others cannot be termed logical. The future of cooperation lies in common economic pursuit and national interests. See the graph of growing trade between India and China.
"getting screwed up at both ends simultaneously by giants like China and India would not be any fun to Nepal at all while it very likely will put her in a complete state of FUBAR"
I term your conclusion very weak. The immense possibility to develop Nepal as a banking, tourism or educational hub lies to policy-makers of Nepal.
The Indian tourists are among the most spending tourists in the world, and Chinese are among largest tourists (50 million Foreign Travellers). The economic growth has always trickled down to Nepal, but we couldn't hold it correct.
There is nothing to fear about India and China, be sure if we were not overrun when the level of consciousness among the population on Nepal was very low, some decades back, it will be impossible to overrun Nepal and Nepalese spirit now. For nationalism lies not in the land, economy and resources but in the heart and soul of population of a country.
Have a good time.