Let's Shoot Chivalry Dead
I see a reflection of a beautiful girl behind me, so being the gentleman, I hope I am, I humbly open the door, and stand holding the door with a moronic smile on my face. The girl stares at me; I stare back hoping that this exchange of glares turns into romantic barter of love (just like the movies). She moves closer to me…. “O, wow…this cologne really works” I think…and then she moves her lips to say, “Why the hell are you holding the door, you think I can’t get it myself, do you think I am weak?” My smile turns into a confused look; I am embarrassed. I feel like a sexist, while all I was trying was to impress the girl with my manners. A lesson learnt I pacify myself.
A couple of days later, I see another girl behind me, and this time, being the “feminist” that I am, I don’t hold open the door for her, and she gives me a highly disgusted look. I am confused yet again. I feel like a pathetic Hamlet, in limbo between “to open” or “not to open.”
Many men today are confused as to how to go about in treating a “lady”. The previously mostly muted, often helpless dame has broken the shell of traditional conformity and embarked on a journey of independence. While leaving her male counterparts mostly clueless about what they need to do to assure her of manners, while not threatening her independence.
In the days gone by, women were considered “weaker” than men, thus they needed that extra protection, that extra care. But being a “feminist,” I feel I am insulting my ideology and women in general, if I were chivalrous for that reason. If I hold on to my belief that women are no less than men, then why all this fuss about chivalry towards women? We should scrap the idea of “ladies first.” And a true lady should not be expected to be treated any differently than a man. Though I condone any kind of violence, why are people not shocked when a woman raises her hand on a man, but make a commotion when the visa versa happens? Violence of any kind should generate the same reaction.
I have heard my female friends say, “We like it when we are treated well and appreciated. ” So do we, I naively respond. “No, but it’s different, we are girls, we are equal but we need to be treated better, we are more equal that you”. More equal? How sexist is that?
My male friends on the other hand think that a woman must we treated well because she is a woman. I question about equality and they say “Treating a woman like a woman does not harm equality”. Like a woman? What does that mean, I ponder.
Treating women equally is a must. When women raise their voices, other women who have not had the opportunity to do so, feel inspired. This leads to a wider awakening of the silently suffering masses. The concept of equality is trampled upon by stupid rules of unnecessary manners. I think it’s unmannered to treat women differently. Treating women differently shows that you are not ready to accept them as equals, while allowing someone to treat you well just because you are a woman shows that you do not consider yourself an equal.
I am not saying that men and women are the same; they are different. Neither am I suggesting that you treat your better half the same way you treat your friends. I suggest that you treat your better half well because she/he is your better half, and not because he/she is a woman or a man.
I see another beautiful lady walking behind me, but this time I hold no doors. I put my morals before my manners. And even though manners, honor, and respect for a fellow human being should never die, any social norm that treats one gender different than the other should be shot dead.
"any social norm that treats one gender different than the other should be shot dead. "overstatement there.a 'different treatment' towards any gender should not have the negative connotation that it does. a different treatment can simply mean an intelligent way to to deal with the either gender, based on their traits. a 'customised treatment' if you will. men and women are DIFFERENT, like it or not. that is nature. that is reality, that is a fundamental fact. trying to enforce blunt equality for the sake of equality is utopian and illusioned. equality in resource availability could be a notion, if it was possible. but flattening the inter-gender interface into a simplified plane of 'one size should fit all' is all too hypothetical.
Thanks for the comments! The idea of the piece was to promote the argument that "Victorian chivalry" or the "chivalry" towards women is based on system that hails women as unequal. By unnecessarily treating them different, on the bases of there sex, constitute inequality. Unneeded chivalry for example- holding the door, the concept of ladies first is what I think should be shot! Do i think an unequal society can be reached? probably not. But its about moving towards that goal. I like the idea of "customised treatment" but I think this should be a case to case customization and not a sex thing.
Would you have opened the door had the woman not been beautiful? I have to ask. You keep making a reference to that. Perhaps you weren't being chivalrous at all, but hoping to get something out of it. Sorry, I only mention it to make a point, not to be critical. I personally would open the door for anyone, out of politeness. Regardless of gender. However, I do strongly believe that chivalry should not die. Men and women are different, we should acknowledge those differences and celebrate them, not pretend that they don't exist. It is an undeniable fact that in general, men are stronger than women, its in our chromosomes, our genetic makeup. If that means shouldering a bag or opening a door for a woman, I have no problem with that. Where equality really comes in is respecting opinion, and respecting a woman's right to do something IF she wants to. So if she says she wants to carry the bag or open the door for herself, let her do it, but its good to offer to do it without being asked.
hey slok i really liked what youve written.if i was the 1st women i would have felt the same..like cant i even open a door by myself??? heheee...we all are talking about equality and stuffs so why pull out chairs and open doors and take her coats (how cheesy!!)???? we can take care of ourselves so why all this?? i totally agree with you about shooting cheesy chivalry!!!!....and ya with due respect to the above comment i also want to ask you would you have just ignored the door if the girl wasnt "beautiful"????
Haha...Believe me or not...the aesthetics beauty of the women did not play a part. I would have done the same regardless of how she looked.
This is simple: treat feminists like men, no more courtesy than you would give to another man. However, non-feminists should be offered chivalry if that's what they want. So, feminists get the equality they want and non-feminist ladies get the chivalry they want. Everybody wins.
Unfortunately Catch, that will not work.
Non-feminists still benefit from feminism. They attend college, work and take advantage of the same opportunities as feminists.
Unless these non-feminists completely adhere to a pre-3rd wave feminist lifestyle, then I will not consider them non-feminists.
Chivalry needs to die. It's a nice concept, but is clearly one-sided. Seriously, what human wouldn't want to be treated extra-special? Why is the female gender the only gender that can capitalise from this special treatment? Perhaps men would live longer if we were elevated on pedestals as often as women.
I will open doors for all genders because it is the nice thing to do. Paying for dinners, initiating courtship and spoiling her on Vagina day (Valentine's day), not so much.
Women are far from being equal to men. Until they initiate courtship, pay for first dates, physically defend their partners and spoil men on Valentine's day as often as men, I will refuse to consider them equals.







Sir, yes, chivalry is some kind of anachronism, but being aware of other people around you and being considerate to them never should go out of fashion. Actually it was never in fashion as you may have noticed. And notice too that I said people, not just women. Also this is a form of altruism, you should not expect anything in return apart from knowing you have added a bit of consideration and kindness into the world for little effort. Problem is you can't predict how other people will react, nor do you need to. Stick to your principles, just smile if you happen to hold a door open for an ignorant person and don't let it deter you. All the best, Koji